Posts Tagged green smoke

Why Many People Prefer GreenSmoke Electronic Cigarettes

So why is everybody heading over to GreenSmoke to get their electronic cigarettes?

Well to sum it up, its the fact that you’re dealing with a company in the USA with great support. They even have a live support chat available. They have a money back guarantee also.

Lets see what some real customers had to say:

These testimonials are statements by customers who Green Smoke. Green Smoke™ does not make any claims that this products helps a person quit smoking or improve their health. See below for our disclaimer.

Best of the Best!!

“Green Smoke is amazing!! Though the cost is a little higher than other brands, you get what you pay for! A new cartridge lasts me a full day.. most of the time (sometimes I do smoke or “vape” more on some days) so it’s as if I am only paying a couple of bucks for a pack of smokes!! Compared to $6 a pack or more a day….. that’s great!! The fact that you get a new atomizer in every cartridge is a plus as well. No need to fuss with cleaning or replacing the atomizer. Also there is no need to mess with any liquid! I haven’t had a cigarette in over two weeks thanks to Green Smoke! I was smoking a pack a day, at least, for the past 16 years.. but no more!! I don’t feel guilty when I use Green Smoke, I am not bothering ( or harming for that matter!) anyone with my second hand smoke… because there is no smoke! I feel better, I don’t smell of smoke anymore and have no desire to smoke cigarettes ever again! Thanks Green Smoke!!”
April 18, 2010 09:11 PM by Michael T
SO HAPPY
“OMG – I will be a customer for life!!!!! Bought another ******** ********* – their product is so inferior and customer service is the WORSE. Green Smoke is the BEST and their customer service just about bends over backwards to help anytime I have called. I tried to give 4 1/2 stars but it wouldn’t let me – the 4 1/2 stars is only due to the ‘con’ listed below, otherwise it would be a full 5 stars. This brand has helped my pocketbook too!!!!!!!!!!! THE only ‘con’ I can come up with is that I wish ship time was a bit faster.”
April 09, 2010 03:24 AM by Donna Colburn
So good
“I just wanted to throw up here that Iv been esmoking with the greensmoke for the past week or so. I love it. never go back to analog cigarettes again. the green smoke feels just like a real cig and produces a lot of “smoke”. however it does it without all the tar and bad stuff and without any odor or second hand smoke effects. It doesnt make your clothes or car smell and it doesnt fog up the room. the smoke disappears fast. def should try. very fast free shipping!”
April 07, 2010 06:30 PM by Anthony
So as you see GreenSmoke has many satisfied customers.
Do yourself a favor and go with something tried and true.
Don’t trust the fly by night companies who will be here and gone.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Legal Status of Electronic Cigarettes by Region

Because of the relative novelty of the technology and the possible relationship to tobacco laws and medical drug policies, electronic cigarette legislation and public health investigations are currently pending in many countries.

* In Australia, the sale of electronic cigarettes containing nicotine is illegal.
* In Brazil electronic cigarettes sales, importation or advertisement of any kind are forbidden. Anvisa, the Brazilian health and sanitation federal agency, found the current health safety assessments about e-cigarettes not to be yet satisfactory to make the product eligible to be approved for commercialization.
* In Canada, as of March 2009, imports, sales, and advertising are banned. In March 2009, Health Canada also advised Canadians not to purchase or use any electronic smoking products. Health Canada cited the Food and Drugs Act, stating that electronic smoking products containing nicotine require market authorization before they can be imported, marketed, or sold. No market authorization has been granted for any electronic smoking product.
* In Denmark, the Danish Medicines Agency classifies electronic cigarettes containing nicotine as medicinal products. Thus, authorization is required from the retailer before the product may be marketed and sold. The agency has clarified, however, that electronic cigarettes that do not administer nicotine to the user, and are not otherwise used for the prevention or treatment of disease, are not considered medicinal devices. The use of electronic cigarettes has not been prohibited in Copenhagen Airport, but at least one airline (Scandinavian Airlines) has decided to ban their use on board flights.
* In Netherlands, use and sale of electronic cigarettes is allowed, but advertising is forbidden pending European Union legislation.
* In New Zealand, the Ministry of Health has ruled that the Ruyan e-cigarette falls under the requirements of the Medicines Act, and cannot be sold except as a registered medicine.
* In Panama, importation, distribution and sale has been prohibited since June 2009. The Ministry of Health cites the FDA findings as their reason for the ban.
* In Singapore, the sale and import of electronic cigarettes, even for personal consumption, is illegal.
* In United Kingdom, use and sale of electronic cigarettes is currently unrestricted, although the MHRA has proposed bringing all nicotine products except tobacco within the medicines licensing regime.

United States

As of November 2009, use is unrestricted, however some imports are being seized. The FDA considers e-cigarettes to be a nicotine delivery system, subject to its approval.

However, in January 2010, federal judge Richard J. Leon ordered the FDA to stop blocking the importation of electronic cigarettes from China, and indicated that the devices should be regulated as tobacco products, rather than drug or medical devices: “[...] With the passage of landmark tobacco legislation last year, the FDA’s new tobacco division will be able to regulate the contents and marketing claims of e-cigarettes, in the same way it is about to begin regulating traditional tobacco products. But the agency’s drug division cannot ban the devices [...]“. Richards mentioned in his reasoning that e-cigarettes were not marketed as medical devices to help smokers quit, as FDA had argued, but rather as safer substitutes to give users the “nicotine hit that smokers crave”. In February 2010, the FDA began an appeal of the ruling in a federal appeals court in Washington. | Doesn’t the FDA have other things to do?

* In California, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill that would have banned sales, stating “[...] If adults want to purchase and consume these products with an understanding of the associated health risks, they should be able to do so [...]“. | Kudos to Arnold for that!

* In New Jersey, legislators have started work on a proposal to ban the use of electronic cigarettes in all “no smoking areas” of the state.  | No surprise here, NJ has there noses in everybodys business.

Tags: , , , ,

Electronic Cigarette Maker Green Smoke Tells FDA to Back Off

MIAMI, Fla. (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — The controversy surrounding electronic cigarettes and the FDA continues. As reported by CNN, New York Times and USA Today, the FDA lost its first battle against e-cigarettes in a federal court and is appealing the ruling. However, e-cigarette maker Green Smoke welcomes the challenge as an opportunity for the industry to prove that the e-cigarette is a healthy alternative to traditional tobacco.

Although Green Smoke and other e-cigarette makers have tested their products with independent laboratories, the FDA and anti-smoking groups have not accepted this evidence of the product’s safety. Corporate interests may also be at play, as a higher demand for electronic cigarettes would affect profit gained by powerful tobacco companies and pharmaceutical makers of nicotine products. State governments would stand to lose tax revenue as well.

Green Smoke’s electronic cigarette is meant to simulate and improve the smoking experience, without cancer-causing chemicals. It emits an odorless vapor of mostly steam, with ingredients like nicotine, water, propylene glycol (an additive used in cake mixes) and others. Without carcinogenics, it’s a healthier alternative to regular tobacco. The nicotine is also available in different strengths.

Since introducing its patented two-piece electronic cigarette, the company has won a loyal base of “green smokers.” Jake, a customer in Alabama said, “The idea sounded strange at first, but the benefits added up – save money, smoke almost anywhere and no ash or tar – I love it.” That it’s a clean cigarette with no ash, butts, odor or second-hand smoke has also won over smokers’ families.

But the cost savings are the most talked-about benefit. Tired of paying $5 to $10 per pack, many customers have switched to electronic cigarettes for the dramatic savings gained over time.

About Green Smoke:

Based in Florida, Green Smoke was founded to provide an authentic smoking experience that is less harmful than traditional tobacco. The company offers electronic e-cigarettes, including its patented two-piece design, starter kits and accessories.

Tags: , , , , , ,